- Present an issue relevant to teachers or administrators in K-12 schools.
- Incorporate the legal contexts or precedents that inform or govern the issue.
- Offer clear implications and practical considerations for schools and educators.
Write
for LAPIS.
LAPIS publishes original work by practitioners, scholars, attorneys, and policymakers who are close to the issues shaping America's schools. If you have something worth saying, we want to hear from you.
- Teachers & Instructional Staff
- School & District Administrators
- Education-Law Scholars & Researchers
- Attorneys Practicing in Education Law
- Policymakers & Policy Advocates
LAPIS is a practitioner-focused magazine. We are not a law review. Every piece we publish should leave a reader with something to do, decide, or watch for on Monday morning.
Submission Categories
Choose the category that best fits your piece. Word counts are guidelines; we'll work with you on length if the content warrants it.
- Laws or policies may be national or state-level.
- State pieces must have relevance for a national audience.
- Summarize the law or policy, then critically discuss its purpose and impacts.
- First-person perspective is welcome and encouraged.
- Ground the piece in a real classroom, hearing, or district decision.
- Close with something a colleague could actually use on Monday morning.
- Briefly state the facts of the case.
- Identify the legal issue or question at hand.
- Cover the court's ruling and reasoning.
- Most importantly — what does this mean for educators?
- One argument, one frame — resist the urge to cover everything.
- Opinionated where the evidence warrants it.
- Suitable for a back-page slot or a margin column.
Have something that doesn't fit neatly into a category? We're flexible. If you have a piece that's genuinely useful to practitioners and educators, pitch us — we'll tell you where it lands. Email lapis@educationlaw.org with a one-paragraph summary.
How to Submit
Every submission goes through our editorial team. We read everything and aim to respond within four weeks. We don't require exclusivity during review, but please let us know if the piece is under simultaneous consideration elsewhere.
Open the Submission Form →Or email directly to lapis@educationlaw.org
Your Full Byline
Full name as you would like it to appear in the magazine. Include the credentials you want printed — title, institution, and any relevant professional designations.
A High-Resolution Headshot
300 dpi minimum. JPEG or TIFF preferred. Low-quality images will not reproduce properly in print, and we cannot run a piece without a printable photo.
Your Manuscript
In the category you're pitching to, within the relevant word count. Word document preferred. Use plain formatting — we'll handle design. Include any citations as endnotes or inline parentheticals.
AI Disclosure
Use of any generative AI tool must be disclosed. Note the tool and describe how it was used. Non-disclosure of AI assistance is grounds for rejection or retraction.
House Style
LAPIS has a strong voice. These four principles will help you write in it — or at least close enough that our editors can work with you.
- Conversational, Not Academic
- We are not a law review. Write the way a thoughtful colleague would explain the issue over coffee. No jargon that a classroom teacher couldn't parse; no footnoted sentences when a clause will do.
- Action-Oriented
- Every piece should leave a practitioner with something to do, decide, or watch for. "Here's what this means for your school on Monday morning" is the frame we're always after.
- Concise
- Articles exceeding 1,500 words are less likely to be published. Bullets are welcome where they genuinely help. Say the most important thing first, not last.
- Engaging
- Lead with the human stake. A real student, a real case, a real decision — then the law. Cite as needed; don't footnote what a sentence can carry.
Pitch us a piece.
The editorial team reviews every submission personally. If your piece isn't right for LAPIS, we'll tell you why — and sometimes suggest a better fit. We'd rather hear from you than not.